Legal Opinion

Howard v. Shoemaker

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided July 10, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00213Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION PHILIP HOWARD, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. CASE NO. 3:22-CV-00213-BSM CAROLYN SHOEMAKER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The motion for partial summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Philip Howard and Phil’s Eazy Trucking LLC [Doc. No. 37] is denied, and the motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendants Marvin Keller Trucking Inc. and Carolyn Shoemaker [Doc. No. 31] is held in abeyance for the reasons provided below. I. BACKGROUND Howard operated a 2015 Freightliner truck and two 2011 Wabash reefer trailers…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Holden v. HirnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Jenkins v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Katharina Holland v. Sam's ClubCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. United Healthcare Corporation v. American Trade Insurance Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API