Ferdinando v. Rosenthal
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtLazarus, J.
The facts herein present a novel situation. Premises 501 West One Hundred and Sixty-ninth street, owned by the defendant Lester Rosenthal, and premises 503 West One Hundred and Sixty-ninth street, owned by the defendant Ben-Dor Corporation, have separate entrances, separate superintendents and separate agents for the management of each house. However, there is a common courtyard with ho apparent marks of demarcation, which serves as a means of ingress to and egress from both houses. Two steps lead from the courtyard to the street, and the plaintiff while walking diagonally across the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Vaughan v. . Transit Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Heskell v. Auburn Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Simmons v. . EversonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Skzypek v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. Syd's, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991