Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Antar
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 2, 2002No. Nos. 00-1820, 00-1836, 00-4357, 00-4100, 01-4208PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*550OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals arise from the civil enforcement actions commenced by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against three main defendants: Sam M. Antar (“Sam”), Allen An-tar, and Benjamin Kuszer. This action alleged insider trading and securities fraud in transactions involving shares in Crazy Eddie, Inc (“Crazy Eddie”). The original complaint, filed in 1993, also named various children and other relatives of the main defendants as relief defendants. District Judge Ackerman, who had previously presided over a criminal matter…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Pfizer Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Margaret Uprichard, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Cosmas v. American Express Centurion BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Daneman v. Stanley (In Re Stanley)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Hart v. Electronic Arts, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- In re WanishUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.