Legal Opinion

Ridnour v. Kenneth R. Johnson, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 16, 2005No. 94,149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knudson, J.:

The respondent, Kenneth R. Johnson, Inc., and its insurance carrier, General Casualty (hereinafter collectively “Johnson”), appeal from the final order of Kansas Workers Compensation Board (Board), contending the injuries of Chad D. Ridnour, claimant, did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. Respondent challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Board’s findings and its construction of K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 44-508(f).

The following question is raised on appeal: (1) Does the “going and coming” rule codified in K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 44-508(f) preclude an award…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foos v. Terminix & Zurich America InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  2. Kindel v. Ferco Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  3. Estate of Soupene Ex Rel. Soupene v. LignitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Taco Bell v. City of MissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Tompkins v. George Rinner Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Halford v. Nowak Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  2. Mendoza v. DCS SANITATIONCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API