Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Town of Londonderry
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 15, 2008No. 2008-047PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The petitioners, Ryder Daniels and Gary Morrissette, appeal an order of the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) upholding the decision of the defendants, Town of Londonderry and the Town of Londonderry Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA), allowing the intervenor, Omnipoint Communications, Inc. (Omnipoint), to build a wireless communications tower in an agricultural-residential zone. We affirm.
I. Background
The following facts appear in the record. Omnipoint sought one use and two area variances in order to construct a 170-foot monopole telecommunications tower on a residential parcel (the parcel) located…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Second Generation Properties, L.P. v. Town of PelhamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Simplex Technologies, Inc. v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Vannah v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Cook v. Town of SanborntonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Boccia v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Industrial Communications & Electronics, Inc. v. Town of AltonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Harborside Associates, L.P. v. Parade Residence Hotel, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- New Cingular v. Manchester, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014
- G. Abdulhay v. Upper Macungie Twp. ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
- Industrial Tower v. East Kingston, NHDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.