Legal Opinion
United States v. Romo-Villalobos
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 20, 2012No. 20-11270PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Per curiam
Hector Romo-Villalobos appeals his convictions and 37-month total sentence for illegal reentry after a felony, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1), and for illegal reentry after conviction of false representation, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1325(a)(1) and 1329. On appeal, he argues that: (1) he should not have received a 16-level sentencing enhancement based on his Florida conviction for resisting an officer with violence, because Florida’s statute does not constitute a crime of violence; and (2) his 37-month sentence was unreasonable because the district court failed to grant him a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Sculptchair, Inc. v. Century Arts, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. Tywan HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Eddy Wilmer Vail-BailonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Marcel Aparicio-SoriaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Marlon EasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Robert William GreenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.