Legal Opinion

George v. Moorhead

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1948No. 30438. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn

The appellants filed a complaint in the superior court of Cook County to contest the will of H. C. Berthold Wetstone, deceased, based upon two grounds, lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. The will ■ was dated September 25, 1941. The decedent died January 10, 1944, and the will was admitted to probate on March 16, 1944. The will contest was filed on December 14, 1944. The complaint is in the usual form, the material allegations of which were denied by the answer. The principal beneficiary was the defendant Dr. Lewis D. Moorhead who was no relative of decedent. All of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McInturff v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Challiner v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Down v. ComstockIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Campbell v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. American Cereal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Peck v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. DeHart v. DeHartIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Eckland v. JankowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Wilkerson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Oak Brook Park District v. Oak Brook Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API