Matter of K.E.G. Youth
Montana Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
JUSTICE McKINNON,
concurring in part and dissenting in part. ¶24 I concur in the Court’s decision to reverse the Youth Court’s order and remand for the entry of a corrected restitution amount. I respectfully dissent, however, from the Court’s analysis in reaching this conclusion. First, I believe the Court has improperly resolved this case based on a legal theory that K.E.G. neither raised in the Youth Court nor relied on in his appeal before this Court. Second, I disagree with the Court’s application of adult sentencing statutes to youth cases, where the Montana Youth Court Act has not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Jefferson v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- State v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.