Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Matter of K.E.G. Youth

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2013No. DA 12-0364Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JUSTICE McKINNON,

concurring in part and dissenting in part. ¶24 I concur in the Court’s decision to reverse the Youth Court’s order and remand for the entry of a corrected restitution amount. I respectfully dissent, however, from the Court’s analysis in reaching this conclusion. First, I believe the Court has improperly resolved this case based on a legal theory that K.E.G. neither raised in the Youth Court nor relied on in his appeal before this Court. Second, I disagree with the Court’s application of adult sentencing statutes to youth cases, where the Montana Youth Court Act has not…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jefferson v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. State v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API