Legal Opinion

Maher v. Maher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 2003PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice LAMB.

We granted allowance of appeal to review two issues relating to a child support order entered for the benefit of the divorced parties’ children. The first issue before this Court is whether the trial court abused its discretion or committed an error of law by requiring Appellant to pay for Appellee’s medical coverage, contrary to Pa.R.C.P.1910.16-6(b). We hold that it did. The second issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion or committed an error of law in determining both the amount and the time period of pro-ration of Appel*183lee’s inheritance income for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Women's Homoeopathic Hospital of Philadelphia CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Blue v. BlueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Ball v. MinnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Humphreys v. DeRossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Synthes USA Sales, LLC v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. K.E.M. v. P.C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. K.E.M. v. P.C.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Hanrahan, M., Aplt. v. Bakker, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Bielak v. BielakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API