Legal Opinion

Hanrahan, M., Aplt. v. Bakker, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 2018No. 19 MAP 2017PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ.

OPINION

JUSTICE BAER

In this discretionary appeal, we consider whether the high income child support guidelines found at Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-3.1 inherently account for the reasonable needs of the children such that any discrete analysis of those needs by a fact-finder is improper.1 We also examine whether a voluntary contribution to an irrevocable non-grantor trust2 for the benefit of the children is an appropriate factor for a court to consider for purposes of deviating from the guidelines amount of child support under Pa.R.C.P.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kripp v. KrippSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Ball v. MinnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Shaver v. KoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barnabei, E. v. DeVitis, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. C.L.M. v. M.L.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. M.P.G. v. J.L.G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. N.A.S. v. K.F.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Order Amending Rules 1910.11, 1910.16-1, 1910.16-2, 1910.16-3, 1910.16-3.1, 1910.16-4, 1910.16-6, 1910.18, and 1910.19 and Rescinding Rule 1910.16 of the PA Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API