Legal Opinion

Garringer v. Garringer

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 2010No. CA 09-1245PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge.

LBy order entered on June 22, 2009, the trial court determined that appellee, Richard Garringer, had proved that he was entitled to an implied easement over his aunt’s, appellant Nellie Garringer’s, adjacent property. For her sole point of appeal, Nellie contends that the trial court erred in finding that Richard met his burden of proof. We affirm the trial court’s decision, but we remand with instructions for the trial court to amend the order to include a specific legal description of the easement at issue in this case.1

\9Standard of Review

In reviewing matters…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Diener v. RatterreeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Hanna v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chiodini v. LockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Whitecotton v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  3. James S. Branscum & Colette R. Branscum v. John Nelson & Whitney ButtsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API