Heyer v. Lee
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Berrien. Specific performance. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Complainant granted to defendant certain real estate in Chicago in exchange for part of a fruit farm in Berrien county. The original bargain was made in writing in Chicago, and was consummated April 20th, 1875. The premises ,to be conveyed by defendant were described therein as “being the south half of the fruit farm now owned by him in the south half of section thirty-four, township four south, range nineteen west, in the town of St. Joseph, county of Berrien, State of Michigan.” April 24, 1875, the defendant, assuming to adhere to the requirements of the written contract, made a deed, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goodenow v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Dart v. BarbourMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Au Gres Boom Co. v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hartford Iron Mining Co. v. Cambria Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Seitz v. People's Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1905