Hartford Iron Mining Co. v. Cambria Mining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette. (Grant, J.) Trover. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Prior to December 1, 1875, the Teal Lake Iron Mining Company was the owner of lot 5, section 36, in town, ship 48 N., of range 27 W., Marquette county, this State.
On that day the company made and executed to James H. McDonald and R. P. Harriman a mining lease of the west half of said lot. By the terms of this lease the second parties were licensed to enter upon-the lands, and to dig thereon, and mine and carry away therefrom, iron ore, for the term of ten years, they having the exclusive right of mining and to carry away ore, and the right to erect thereon and maintain such buildings and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lockwood v. Thunder Bay River Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Dart v. BarbourMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Jones v. PashbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Jones v. PashbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Au Gres Boom Co. v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brewer v. SchammerhornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Ferguson v. Basin Consolidated MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hartford Iron Mining Co. v. Cambria Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Lupyan v. LupyanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Owen v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.