Legal Opinion
Trenwyth Industries, Inc. v. Burns & Russell Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 16, 1988No. Civ. A. 88-1863PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The defendant in this matter, The Burns and Russell Company of Baltimore City (“Burns”), 1 has moved this Court for several forms of relief. First, Burns moves for a dismissal of this action on the grounds that the Court has no personal jurisdiction over it. Second, and in the alternative, Burns asks that this action be dismissed on the basis of improper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391. In the event the Court determines that a dismissal is not appropriate, Burns asks that this action be transferred to the District Court for the District of Maryland under…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Allenberg Cotton Co. v. PittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 2215 Fifth Street Associates, LP v. U-Haul International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Gipson v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Liban v. Churchey Group II, L.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. v. BivinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014