Legal Opinion

Guadagno v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mario J. Rossetti, J.

Motion by defendant, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, and joined in by defendants, L.C.P. Chemicals & Plastics, Inc., *713and third-party defendant, Town of Hamburg, for summary judgment.

On October 31, 1981, at 7:00 a.m., plaintiff, a Town of Hamburg police officer, while off duty, was contacted at home and advised that a train had derailed, prompting a declaration of a state of emergency in the town, and was ordered to report to the area of the derailment. Upon his arrival, plaintiff was told that there was a fire, creating the danger of an explosion,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krauth v. Israel Geller and Buckingham Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Santangelo v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Walters v. SloanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McGee v. Adams Paper & Twine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  5. Fletcher v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Guadagno v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API