Legal Opinion
Warne v. Harkness
California Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1963No. Sac. 7496PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
The Director of Water Resources seeks a writ of mandate to compel the Director of General Services to comply with an order of the Department of Water Resources to print a resolution of that department concerning various facilities, including a dam, which are to be constructed in the vicinity of Oroville and are designated as the “Oroville Division.” The resolution authorizes the issuance of Central Valley Project revenue bonds in the amount of $327,000,000 to meet such costs of features, units, and portions of units of the Oroville Division as are allocable to the generation, transmission and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re WilliamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Burbank v. Metropolitan Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by69 opinions
- People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.