Legal Opinion

Salazar v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 1, 2008No. 07-07-0432-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

Joe Christian Salazar appeals his conviction for burglary of a building. His sole issue concerns the trial court’s decision denying his request for an instruction on the offense of criminal trespass. The latter allegedly was a lesser-included offense of the crime for which he was indicted. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

Law

With the advent of Hall v. State, 225 S.W.3d 524 (Tex.Crim.App.2007), the methodology used in determining whether an accused is entitled to an instruction on a lesser-included offense has changed. The test still consists of two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Salazar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Jennings v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  3. Aida Dominguez Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009
  4. Anna Darlene North v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
  5. Bobby Wayne Terry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API