Legal Opinion
Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 19, 1973No. C-73-0423 OJCPublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
OLIVER J. CARTER, Chief Judge.
Defendant Xerox and the nine individual defendants in this case have moved the Court to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and to strike each of its counts.
Plaintiff Van Hoomissen is suing defendants for various alleged acts of retaliation, to wit: denial of job advancement opportunities with the accompanying salary increases, demotion, and finally, termination of employment. The alleged retaliation was in response to plaintiff’s asserted attempts to change the hiring policy of Xerox, which he believes discriminates against Mexican Americans at its…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Richerson v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Rogers v. Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.