Legal Opinion

Stacey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 26, 1994No. A94A1654PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Raymond Allen Stacey appeals his conviction as a habitual violator defined under OCGA § 40-5-58.

1. In his first enumeration of error, Stacey contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for new trial in that a fatal variance existed between the allegations of the indictment and the evidence adduced at trial. The indictment charged, in pertinent part, that Stacey “after having been declared to be a habitual violator by the Georgia Department of Public Safety, did operate a motor vehicle on Blandburg Road.” At trial, two witnesses identified Stacey as the driver of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Denson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Nesmith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. McClendon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Eidson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Orr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API