Legal Opinion

Hunt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 13, 1995No. A95A2615PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Larry Hunt was convicted of selling cocaine. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals.

1. Hunt contends the State was erroneously permitted to make prejudicial closing remarks. He complains about the prosecutor’s comment that Hunt was a drug dealer who caused people to become addicts: “Larry Hunt is not an addict. [He] is a drug dealer. He’s the one that pushes the stuff on addicts. He’s the one who makes the addicts, the addicts who when they take this stuff once and that’s about all it takes.” The prosecutor also commented regarding the effects of crack cocaine,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crowe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. McKibbons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Aldridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API