Schomaker v. Armour, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’Connell, RJ.
The present appeal from the circuit court’s determination that a writ of superintending control may not be issued is predicated on a prior action brought in the small claims division of the district court. In that action, Armour, Inc., brought suit against Richard Schomaker, alleging breach of contract. Armour prevailed on the merits, and a judgment was entered for Armour. Schomaker was unhappy with the judgment and brought a motion for a new trial, relief from judgment, or modification of judgment, which motion was denied.
Because a party appearing in small claims court waives…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. Flint Municipal JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- In RE PEOPLE v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Marshall v. PechMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fieger v. CoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007