Legal Opinion

Principato v. Rudd

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 24, 1981No. 81-922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

Defendants Henry Rudd, Marion Rudd, Rudd Container Company, and Anthony Reda appeal the granting of a new trial to plaintiff James Principato, Jr. Plaintiff filed a one-count negligence complaint concerning a truck collision. After a jury verdict for defendants, the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. We granted defendants leave to appeal under Supreme Court Rule 306. (73 Ill. 2d R. 306.) Plaintiff also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Plaintiff James Principato, Jr., was an electrician for Advance Neon Sign Company.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sweeney v. Max A. R. Matthews & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bryntesen v. Carroll Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fugate v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Mulvey v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kritzen v. Flender Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Robinson v. Greeley & HansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Moore v. Centreville Township HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Hunter v. SukkarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Lagoni v. Holiday Inn MidwayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API