Daley v. Cunningham
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs and from an order denying a new trial in the Nineteenth District Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Wheeler, J. Action by Annie Daley and John H. Daley, her husband, and Savings and Loan Society against J. A. Cunningham et al.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs and from an order denying a new trial in the Nineteenth District Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Wheeler, J. Action by Annie Daley and John H. Daley, her husband, and Savings and Loan Society against J. A. Cunningham et al. The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs Daley on the sixth day of June, 1874, executed a mortgage upon certain premises to the Savings and Loan Society to secure a promissory note, etc.; that on the tenth day of June, 1874, the defendant Cunningham entered into a written contract with the plaintiffs Daley to…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court:
We do not think there was any misjoinder of parties plaintiff in this canse (C. C. P., 382), and are of the opinion that the demurrer on that ground was properly overruled.
We find no error in the record, and the judgment and order are affirmed.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Hall v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bassot v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918