Jane L. v. Rodney B.
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Nanette Dembitz, J.
The major defense presented by the alleged father in this paternity suit is that petitioner had sexual intercourse with three other men during the period when concededly conception occurred and respondent had intercourse with her. This defense presents the question of the applicability of section 531 of the Family Court Act, which provides: “If the respondent shall offer testimony of access by others at or about the time charged in the complaint, such testimony shall not be competent or admissible in evidence except *762when corroborated by other facts and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. KressNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Carr v. New York State Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MullensNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Matter of Dorn" Hh" v. Lawrence" II"New York Court of Appeals · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.