Legal Opinion

Matter of Dorn" Hh" v. Lawrence" II"

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1972PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*156Gibson, J.

Appellant challenges the constitutionality of the statute which, in a filiation proceeding, excludes a respondent’s uncorroborated proof of access by others to the woman involved.1 The order of the Family Court adjudging him to be the father of a child born out of wedlock and directing him to make payments for the support of the child was unanimously affirmed at the Appellate Division. The affirmed findings, depending in part on appellant’s admissions, are not questioned on this appeal.

On the trial, appellant offered proof by three of his fellow students at the college petitioner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York Rapid Transit Corp. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Shielcrawt v. MoffettNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Commissioner of Public Welfare v. KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. People v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In re the Adoption of Malpica-OrsiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Kletnieks v. Brookhaven Memorial Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Czajak v. VavoneseNew York City Family Court · 1980
  4. In re OrzoNew York City Family Court · 1975
  5. In re MartzNew York City Family Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API