Legal Opinion

Greasham v. Booher

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 14, 2001No. 01-6064Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Petitioner Oscar Ray Greasham, a state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We deny the request for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Colorado, Inc. , Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. John Francis RourkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Ward v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  5. Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API