Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Kortum

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1997No. S-95-1358PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

This is an original action for a peremptory writ of mandamus brought by relator, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart). We are asked to determine whether a writ should issue disqualifying the law firm of Van Steenberg, Chaloupka, Mullin, Holyoke, Pahlke, Smith, Snyder, and Hofmeister, P.C. (Van Steenberg), from representing a party in an action against Wal-Mart because of the firm’s prior representation of Wal-Mart in another case.

We set forth a “substantially related” test and conclude that Van Steenberg’s prior representation of Wal-Mart is not substantially related to the present action against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Slc Limited V, a California Limited Partnership v. Bradford Group West, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Wieland v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Freezer Services, Inc. v. MullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Scherer v. Madison County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State Ex Rel. FirsTier Bank v. MullenNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Richardson v. GriffithsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. City of Elkhorn v. HaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hawkes v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. EhlersNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Garvey v. County Board of CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API