Legal Opinion
Cox v. HP Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 2021No. S067138PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
477 Argued and submitted November 16, 2020, a peremptory writ of mandamus shall issue August 5, 2021 William COX and Diosdada “Josie” Cox, Plaintiffs, v. HP INC., dba HP Computing and Printing, Inc., a foreign corporation; Charter Mechanical Contractors, Inc., dba Charter Mechanical, an Oregon corporation; and Spirax Sarco, Inc., a foreign corporation, Defendants. HP INC., dba HP Computing and Printing, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Adverse Party, v. TÜV RHEINLAND OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., a foreign corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Relator, and PROTON ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC., a foreign…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cox v. HP Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Adams v. Aircraft Spruce & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- M. C. v. Quest Global, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Potter v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- HP Inc. v. TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.