Legal Opinion

Cox v. HP Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 12, 2022No. A172614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

27 Argued and submitted November 10, 2020, affirmed January 12, 2022 William COX and Diosdada “Josie” Cox, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HP INC., dba HP Computing and Printing, Inc., a foreign corporation; and Charter Mechanical Contractors, Inc., dba Charter Mechanical, an Oregon corporation, Defendants, and SPIRAX SARCO, INC., a foreign corporation, Defendant-Respondent. HP INC., dba HP Computing and Printing, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. TÜV RHEINLAND OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., a foreign corporation; and Proton Energy Systems, Inc., a foreign corporation, Third-Party Defendants. Multnomah…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2021
  5. J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. Aircraft Spruce & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. M. C. v. Quest Global, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. M. C. v. Quest Global, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API