Legal Opinion
Seitz v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 22, 2020No. 4:20-cv-05442Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES EDWARD SEITZ, Case No. 20-cv-05442-DMR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 10 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF Re: Dkt. No. 23 TEAMSTERS, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pro se Plaintiff James E. Seitz filed a complaint for breach of the duty of fair 14 representation against Defendants International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”), Teamsters 15 Local 986 (“Teamsters 986), and Chris Griswold. Defendants now move pursuant to Federal Rule 16 of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the complaint.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.