Legal Opinion

Amey v. Pittsburg School District

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 1, 1949No. 3817PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Since more than a two-thirds majority of the votes cast were in favor of the article and it was declared adopted, the article was passed as stated in the warrant. 2 Words and Phrases (Perm. ed.) 485.

The plaintiffs allege that the vote of the district was void because it failed to fix the term of the bonds or to delegate the power to do so to the school board.

"It is a principle of general application that votes passed at town-meetings should be liberally construed. If they fall within the authorized powers of the town, ingenious distinctions . . . will not be unnecessarily resorted to, when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Davison v. ParksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  2. New London v. DavisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  4. Gove v. LoveringSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1825

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashley v. Rye School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  2. Shadow v. Rapides Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Baker v. Hudson School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  4. Foote v. Manchester School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API