Legal Opinion
Foote v. Manchester School District
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 7, 2005No. 2005-093PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The petitioners, Bedford taxpayers William Foote and Raymond C. Dugdale, appeal the order of the Superior Court (Conboy, J.) denying their summary judgment motion and granting the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the respondents, the Manchester School District (MSD) and the Bedford School District (BSD). We affirm.
The trial court accepted the following facts as undisputed, many of which were derived from our opinion in a related appeal. See Bedford Chapter — Citizens for a Sound Economy v. Sch. Admin. Unit #25, 151 N.H. 612 (2004). Historically, BSD has not had its own high school.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Appeal of the Sanborn Regional School BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Appeal of SoucySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Appeal of Franklin Education Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Ashley v. Rye School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Rochester v. CorpeningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Carrier v. American Bankers LifeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2006