Merrill v. Newton
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gratiot; Daboll, J. Case by Parker Merrill against James E. Newton for deceit. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The declaration filed in this cause alleges that the defendant was owner of blocks 66 and 67 of the village of St. Louis, and, as an inducement to the plaintiff to purchase the same, produced and exhibited to the plaintiff a regularly executed plat of the W. fractional ■J- of the N. W. fractional J of section 30, dated October 30, 1873, upon which land said blocks were situate, and represented that said blocks were bounded on the *250south by a duly-platted street, 66 feet wide, called “Prospect Street,” which street had not been accepted or used by the public, and that he covenanted that said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Merrill v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wegner v. HerkimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Morain v. TeschMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Ratliff v. Farmers' State Bank of GreentopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916