Legal Opinion

SMITHFIELD OIL COMPANY v. Furlonge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1962No. 532PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

The defendants list thirteen assignments of error. However, the hub of the appeal is clearly the denial of their motions for nonsuit, and a discussion of the questions raised by these motions will dispose of the other assignments of error.

In support of their motions for nonsuit defendants argue that: (1) the option was personal between the original parties and was not assignable to the plaintiff; (2) plaintiff did not tender the $25,000.00 purchase price; (3) on March 19, 1954, Robert A. Bradley, one of the members of the partnership which was the grantee in the original lease of February 13,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Millikan v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Strigas v. Durham Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Harry's Cadillac-Pontiac Co. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Pearson v. MillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  5. Pearson v. . MillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Lagies v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Magers v. Thomas (In Re Vannoy)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1994
  4. Simmons v. Quick-Stop Food Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Hurst v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API