Legal Opinion
Everest Reinsurance Co. v. Howard
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided August 28, 1997No. 03-97-00035-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIDD, Justice.
Both Everest Reinsurance Company (“Everest”) and James A. Howard, challenge portions of the trial court’s order allowing Everest to remove this cause to federal court, but enjoining Everest from seeking arbitration in federal court. We will affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court’s judgment.
BACKGROUND
Each year from 1985 to 1990, Everest Reinsurance Company (“Everest”) 1 entered into reinsurance agreements with Texas Employers’ Insurance Association (“Texas Employers”). In 1991 Texas Employers was declared insolvent, and the 201st District Court of Travis County (the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Department of Treasury v. FabeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. StudeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Moore v. Interstate Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Villas of Mount Pleasant, LLC v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
- the Villas of Mount Pleasant, LLC D/B/A Greenhill Villas, F/D/B/A Villas of Mount Pleasant, Mt. Pleasant Operators, LLC, and Lloyd Douglas v. Kyle King, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Marilou Whatley King, and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Marilou Whatley King, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015