Legal Opinion

State v. Broderick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1879PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.

The appellant was indicted, with others, for grand larceny, and charged with having stolen three mules, the property of one Monegan. The evidence showed that the appellant had the property in his possession as bailee of the owner, and, together with instructions as to larceny, the following instruction was given: “If, from the evidence, the jury find that the defendant Broderick was the bailee of the wit*20ness Monegan, and that as such bailee the mules described in the indictment, and the property of said Monegan, were in his, Broderick’s, possession and under his care, and that he, Broderick,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norton v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1836

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. The Children's Bootery v. SutkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Ex Parte LingenfelterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Wallis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Hunt v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API