Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Finney
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 19, 1965No. 18392PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moss, Justice.
Harold Johnson, the respondent herein, brought this action against Claude S. Finney, Claude S. Finney, Jr., the appellants herein, and Dickerson, Inc., to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when he was struck by an automobile while walking along the western side of U. S. Highway No. 17 at a point on said highway about 9/10 of a mile north of the northern entrance to Pawleys Island. The automobile which struck Johnson was owned by Claude S. Finney and was being operated at the time by his son, Claude S. Finney, Jr., it being asserted he was, under the family purpose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Haralson v. Jones Truck LinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
- West v. SowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Mize v. Blue Ridge Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Minacci v. LogudiceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Smith v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Small v. Pioneer MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. SOUTHEASTERN SECURITY SYS., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Pittman v. GallowayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Watts v. Bell Oil Co. of Ocean Drive, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.