Legal Opinion

Smith v. Canal Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 15, 1955No. 17055PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

The jury returned verdict in favor of the above plaintiff,, now appellant, for five thousand dollars damages for the-alleged wrongful death of his intestate. Code of 1952, Section 10-1951. Upon respondents’ motion the trial court set the verdict aside and rendered judgment for them (the defendants!) notwithstanding the verdict, upon the ground, that appellant’s intestate was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. This appeal followed.

A taxicab, which was owned by the respondent Smith and for the operation of which respondent Canal Insurance-Company had furnished…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tysinger v. Coble Dairy ProductsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Citizens National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Crawley v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Dawson v. South Carolina Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Seahorn v. KarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. FinneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  2. Easler v. PappasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  3. Williams v. KalutzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. King v. MattoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. Lester v. McFaddonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API