Legal Opinion · Dissent

Duncan v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 17, 1978No. CR77-213Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I have difficulty in relating the failure to proffer evidence of previous sexual activity by the prosecuting witness to the ruling of the trial court. The ruling questioned was made sua sponte in camera before the trial commenced. It was very sweeping. The circuit judge said:

THE COURT: Let the record show that this is in chambers and out of the presence and hearing of the jury.

Counsel for the State and for. the defendant are admonished by the Court not to make any reference either by way of cross-examination of the alleged victim nor will they be permitted to offer any extrinsic evidence…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Pleasant v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  3. Sprouse v. MagesIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Fike v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API