Legal Opinion

Furtado ex rel. Furtado v. Walmer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 22, 1996No. 94-3533PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We find no error in the trial court’s failure to grant appellants’ request for a jury instruction on aggravation of a preexisting condition.

Although we conclude that the trial court erred in precluding appellants’ counsel from eliciting the identity of the insurance carrier in his redirect examination of Dr. Alexakis, see Krawzak v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 660 So.2d 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), rev. granted, 670 So.2d 938 (Fla.1996), we find such error to be harmless under the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, we affirm.

GLICKSTEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur. POLEN, J., dissents with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Krawzak v. Government Emp. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medina v. PeraltaSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Medina v. PeraltaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Medina v. PeraltaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API