Legal Opinion
United States v. Armour & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 26, 1948No. 9349PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant was convicted on seventeen counts of an indictment which charged it with violating regulations issued pursuant to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., prohibiting tie-in sales.
The violations occurred at three of appellant’s branch houses, two in Philadelphia and one in Norristown. All three branch houses were supervised by a district manager and there was no evidence that he had any knowledge of the offenses. There was-some evidence that the assistant manager of the Philadelphia, Noble Street, branch…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People Ex Rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms-Slawson-Decker Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Beneficial Finance CompanyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- United States v. Willi Beusch and Deak & Company of California, Inc., United States of America v. Willi Beusch and Deak & Company of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Michael L. Shakman, and v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, and City of Chicago and Michael CardilliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Continental Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Standard Oil Company of Texas and Pasotex Pipe Line Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.