Legal Opinion

People v. Valentine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in precluding the defendant from presenting an alibi witness on the ground that the defendant did not provide adequate notice under CPL 250.20, since the defendant did not provide a sufficient explanation for his failure to comply (see, People v Delarosa, 215 AD2d 496; People v Toro, 198 AD2d 532).

In addition, it cannot be said that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request to be sentenced as a youthful offender (see, People v Williams, 124 AD2d 615).

The defendant’s remaining contentions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. People v. ToroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. DelarosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BonnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API