Legal Opinion

Harding v. Pinchot

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1931No. Appeals, 1 and 2PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

These two bills filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County, one by Mabel M. Hamilton and the other by George J. Harding, against these defendants, raise the same questions of law, were argued together, and will both be disposed of in this opinion. The Hamilton bill avers an interest both personal and as a taxpayer ; the Harding bill avers interest as a taxpayer and is filed for himself and “all other taxpayers who may join” therein.

The facts are not in dispute. Miss Hamilton had been a notary public continuously for the past twenty-four years,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Busser v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Appeal of HartranftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. De Chastellux v. FairchildSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Lewis, Aud. Gen.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Everett v. HarronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Fischer v. Citizens CommitteeNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kirk v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  4. League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Robinson v. ShappCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API