Legal Opinion
United States v. Jordan
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 14, 1980No. 79-1633PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Appellant, Earl T. Jordan, was found guilty by a jury on all charges alleged in a fifty count indictment. The offenses were composed of (1) twenty-three counts of mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341); (2) one count charging a false claim against the United States (18 U.S.C. § 287); and (3) twenty-six counts charging the fraudulent uttering of checks with forged endorsements (18 U.S.C. § 495). Jordan did not testify at trial and the charged offenses were clearly proven by very strong direct and circumstantial evidence. Sentences of twenty (20) months to five (5) years were imposed…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Stephen Hathaway, United States of America v. Howard BaptistaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William CuddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. William Herbert Greene, IIICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Rayful Edmond, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Rezaq, Omar MohammedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Mary Rose Oakar and Joseph DemioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.