Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. Crosby

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 2006No. 1D05-0673PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

922 So.2d 236 (2006)

Akeem MUHAMMAD, Appellant,

v.

James CROSBY, Appellee.

No. 1D05-0673.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 10, 2006.

Appellant, pro se.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Tobey Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, CERTIFICATION, AND CONSOLIDATION

2Per curiam

Appellant seeks rehearing of the opinion issued in this case on November 7, 2005, and consolidation with another appeal pending in this court, Muhammad v. Decker, 1D05-1208. Appellee seeks rehearing, rehearing en banc, and certification. We…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Harris v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Warner v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. Green v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Mayweathers v. TerhuneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garrick John v. Michael D. Crews, Secretary, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Reddick v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Simpkins v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Grooms v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Muhammad v. DeckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API