Legal Opinion

Reddick v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 2006No. Case No. 1D05-5044PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

938 So.2d 595 (2006)

NAPOLEON REDDICK, Petitioner,

v.

JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Case No. 1D05-5044.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Opinion filed September 27, 2006.

Napoleon Reddick, pro se, Petitioner.

Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Carrie R. McNair and Sean F. Callaghan, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

After losing 90 days of future gain-time as a consequence of a prison disciplinary proceeding, Napoleon Reddick sought relief in the circuit court by petition for writ of mandamus. The circuit court…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. CrusoeSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Muhammad v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Clark v. McDonoughDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Grooms v. Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API