Legal Opinion
Newman v. State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 2, 1950No. 12423Published
1Opinion of the Court
184 F.2d 515
NEWMAN
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 12423.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
August 22, 1950.
Rehearing Denied October 2, 1950.
See 185 F.2d 392.
Emil Newman, in pro. per.
Dion R. Holm, City Atty., Thomas M. O'Connor, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees City & County of San Francisco, and Elmer E. Robinson.
Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen., Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees State of Cal., Fred N. Howser & Session (appearing specially).
Before STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges, and McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
2Per curiam 1
1
This appeal is from an order which…
Also in this document: Per curiam 2.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Blanco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Newman v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Newman v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950