Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentO’Hern, J.
But for its decision not to have the jury in this case consider the punitive damages claims in light of the principles it suggests today, I would join the opinion of the Court. With the exception that I believe that the jury should be clearly convinced that the proofs measure up to the standard, I find myself in basic accord with the Court’s emphasis on the need to instruct juries on the purposes of punitive damages, the consideration of proportion in an award, the nature of conduct to be sanctioned, and the effect of prior awards in their deliberations. I also agree with the Court’s…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- School District of Lancaster v. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.