Legal Opinion

Klineschmidt v. Schmidt

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 14, 1932No. 4703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALSCTIULER, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from an order of the District Court confirming that of the referee in bankruptcy, in a summary proceeding against appellants, requiring appellants to pay over to the trustee the avails of certain garnishment proceedings in the civil court of Milwaukee.

Klinesehmidt, a director and vice president of bankrupt corporation, by Haddock, Ms attorney, on November 5, 1930, commenced in the civil court an action for wages alleged to be due him from the corporate bankrupt, and at the same time instituted garnishment proceedings against certain debtors of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Van DusenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. La Crosse National Bank v. WilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In re LesserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901
  5. Maxwell v. Bank of New RichmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reifsnyder v. B. Levy & SonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  2. Spensley v. Theodore Ebert & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API