In re Lesser
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. • On motion to vacate stay.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
This is a motion to vacate a stay of proceedings heretofore granted against the further prosecution of two suits in Connecticut against the bankrupts, in which the Brainerd & Armstrong Company, a corporation, was plaintiff, and in which it had by process of foreign attachment garnished certain debts owing *202to the bankrupts. The garnishee process was served in one suit in October, 1896, and in the other in June, 1897, by which under the law of Connecticut a lien wa's created, to continue until 60 days after judgment upon the property attached, to secure the payment of any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re KenneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
- Beardsley v. BeecherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Harwood v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1924
- Vogle v. LathropDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1870
3Cited by15 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. MedlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Armour Packing Co. v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- In re BlairDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1901
- In re Beaver Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- In re McCartneyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.